Benchmark VPS KVM Inception Hosting

Ini sebagai lanjutan dari review Inception Hosting sebelumnya. Bedanya dulu saya mengulas berdasarkan OpenVZ, sekarang (akhirnya) yang KVM in-stock lagi. Dan ada promo diskon 50%, ya jelas saya angkut. 😉

Intinya saya sangat puas dengan kualitas VPS dari Inception Hosting, karena itu ga ragu untuk membeli VPS baru untuk menggantikan yang lama. Secara spesifikasi sih setara aslinya, tapi jelas saya lebih condong ke KVM apabila bisa dan terjangkau harganya. 😀

Spesifikasi VPS yang saya beli dan ulas kali ini:

  • UK-SSD-KVM-1024
  • 2 CPU Core (Equal Share)
  • 1024 MB Ram
  • 10 GB Pure NVMe SSD Disk space
  • 1000 GB Bandwidth @ 1 gbit (shared)
  • 1 x IPv4 address
  • 1 x /64 IPv6
  • Full daily backup
  • €4.00/month

Diawali dengan informasi prosesornya:

lscpu
Architecture:          x86_64
CPU op-mode(s):        32-bit, 64-bit
Byte Order:            Little Endian
CPU(s):                2
On-line CPU(s) list:   0,1
Thread(s) per core:    1
Core(s) per socket:    1
Socket(s):             2
NUMA node(s):          1
Vendor ID:             GenuineIntel
CPU family:            6
Model:                 94
Model name:            Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1270 v5 @ 3.60GHz
Stepping:              3
CPU MHz:               3599.994
BogoMIPS:              7199.98
Hypervisor vendor:     KVM
Virtualization type:   full
L1d cache:             32K
L1i cache:             32K
L2 cache:              4096K
L3 cache:              16384K
NUMA node0 CPU(s):     0,1
Flags:                 fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss syscall nx pdpe1gb rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon rep_good nopl xtopology eagerfpu pni pclmulqdq ssse3 fma cx16 pcid sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic movbe popcnt tsc_deadline_timer aes xsave avx f16c rdrand hypervisor lahf_lm abm 3dnowprefetch arat xsaveopt fsgsbase tsc_adjust bmi1 hle avx2 smep bmi2 erms invpcid rtm rdseed adx smap

Struktur storage (NVMe):

df -h
Filesystem      Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/vda1       8.9G  1.5G  7.0G  17% /
devtmpfs        492M     0  492M   0% /dev
tmpfs           497M     0  497M   0% /dev/shm
tmpfs           497M   19M  478M   4% /run
tmpfs           497M     0  497M   0% /sys/fs/cgroup
tmpfs           100M     0  100M   0% /run/user/0

Kondisi memori saat masih baru terinstall sistem operasinya:

free -m
              total        used        free      shared  buff/cache   available
Mem:            993          91         290          18         612         715
Swap:             0           0           0

Dilanjutkan dengan benchmark umum sistemnya:

----------------------------------------------------------------------
CPU model            : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1270 v5 @ 3.60GHz
Number of cores      : 2
CPU frequency        : 3599.994 MHz
Total size of Disk   : 8.9 GB (1.5 GB Used)
Total amount of Mem  : 993 MB (91 MB Used)
Total amount of Swap : 0 MB (0 MB Used)
System uptime        : 0 days, 0 hour 26 min
Load average         : 0.00, 0.01, 0.05
OS                   : CentOS 7.4.1708
Arch                 : x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel               : 3.10.0-123.4.2.el7.x86_64
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I/O speed(1st run)   : 1.0 GB/s
I/O speed(2nd run)   : 1.2 GB/s
I/O speed(3rd run)   : 1.2 GB/s
Average I/O speed    : 1160.5 MB/s
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Node Name                       IPv4 address            Download Speed
CacheFly                        205.234.175.175         111MB/s       
Linode, Tokyo, JP               106.187.96.148          7.84MB/s      
Linode, Singapore, SG           139.162.23.4            6.36MB/s      
Linode, London, UK              176.58.107.39           108MB/s       
Linode, Frankfurt, DE           139.162.130.8           51.3MB/s      
Linode, Fremont, CA             50.116.14.9             6.61MB/s      
Softlayer, Dallas, TX           173.192.68.18           11.1MB/s      
Softlayer, Seattle, WA          67.228.112.250          9.86MB/s      
Softlayer, Frankfurt, DE        159.122.69.4            63.6MB/s      
Softlayer, Singapore, SG        119.81.28.170           6.99MB/s      
Softlayer, HongKong, CN         119.81.130.170          5.81MB/s      
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Node Name                       IPv6 address            Download Speed
Linode, Atlanta, GA             2600:3c02::4b           15.0MB/s      
Linode, Dallas, TX              2600:3c00::4b           5.46MB/s      
Linode, Newark, NJ              2600:3c03::4b           16.0MB/s      
Linode, Singapore, SG           2400:8901::4b           7.55MB/s      
Linode, Tokyo, JP               2400:8900::4b           8.51MB/s      
Softlayer, San Jose, CA         2607:f0d0:2601:2a::4    9.94MB/s      
Softlayer, Washington, WA       2607:f0d0:3001:78::2    7.49MB/s      
Softlayer, Paris, FR            2a03:8180:1301:8::4     83.4MB/s      
Softlayer, Singapore, SG        2401:c900:1101:8::2     9.92MB/s      
Softlayer, Tokyo, JP            2401:c900:1001:16::4    5.26MB/s      
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Ternyata I/O speednya lebih gila lagi, mencapai 1GB/s! Ini jauh lebih cepat dibandingkan milik saya sebelumnya yang juga NVMe. Mungkin karena node baru juga. Secara bandwidth masih 11-12, ya karena data center yang digunakan masih sama. Lokasinya juga masih di UK.

Seperti biasa, kita lanjutkan dengan tes performa sistem secara keseluruhan:

   #    #  #    #  #  #    #          #####   ######  #    #   ####   #    #
   #    #  ##   #  #   #  #           #    #  #       ##   #  #    #  #    #
   #    #  # #  #  #    ##            #####   #####   # #  #  #       ######
   #    #  #  # #  #    ##            #    #  #       #  # #  #       #    #
   #    #  #   ##  #   #  #           #    #  #       #   ##  #    #  #    #
    ####   #    #  #  #    #          #####   ######  #    #   ####   #    #

   Version 5.1.3                      Based on the Byte Magazine Unix Benchmark

   Multi-CPU version                  Version 5 revisions by Ian Smith,
                                      Sunnyvale, CA, USA
   January 13, 2011                   johantheghost at yahoo period com


1 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Double-Precision Whetstone  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Execl Throughput  1 2 3

1 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks  1 2 3

1 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks  1 2 3

1 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks  1 2 3

1 x Pipe Throughput  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Pipe-based Context Switching  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Process Creation  1 2 3

1 x System Call Overhead  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)  1 2 3

1 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)  1 2 3

2 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

2 x Double-Precision Whetstone  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

2 x Execl Throughput  1 2 3

2 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks  1 2 3

2 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks  1 2 3

2 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks  1 2 3

2 x Pipe Throughput  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

2 x Pipe-based Context Switching  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

2 x Process Creation  1 2 3

2 x System Call Overhead  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

2 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)  1 2 3

2 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)  1 2 3

========================================================================
   BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)

   System: inception2.servernesia.com: GNU/Linux
   OS: GNU/Linux -- 3.10.0-123.4.2.el7.x86_64 -- #1 SMP Mon Jun 30 16:09:14 UTC 2014
   Machine: x86_64 (x86_64)
   Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8")
   CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1270 v5 @ 3.60GHz (7200.0 bogomips)
          x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
   CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1270 v5 @ 3.60GHz (7200.0 bogomips)
          x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
   19:30:57 up 47 min,  1 user,  load average: 0.03, 0.04, 0.05; runlevel 3

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Wed Mar 21 2018 19:30:57 - 19:59:30
2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables       43432324.1 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                     3954.4 MWIPS (12.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               3643.2 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks       1098996.4 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          304239.3 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       2668632.3 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                             1935019.4 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                 382218.3 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                              12835.3 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   8457.4 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   1600.3 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                        3161626.4 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   43432324.1   3721.7
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       3954.4    719.0
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       3643.2    847.3
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0    1098996.4   2775.2
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     304239.3   1838.3
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    2668632.3   4601.1
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0    1935019.4   1555.5
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     382218.3    955.5
Process Creation                                126.0      12835.3   1018.7
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       8457.4   1994.7
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0       1600.3   2667.2
System Call Overhead                          15000.0    3161626.4   2107.8
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                        1763.3

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Wed Mar 21 2018 19:59:30 - 20:27:55
2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables       82255083.4 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                     8606.6 MWIPS (11.3 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               8528.0 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks       1453914.7 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          402764.4 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       4144739.4 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                             3675534.0 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                 710939.7 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                              29246.3 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                  12823.6 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   1837.1 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                        4751603.8 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   82255083.4   7048.4
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       8606.6   1564.8
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       8528.0   1983.3
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0    1453914.7   3671.5
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     402764.4   2433.6
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    4144739.4   7146.1
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0    3675534.0   2954.6
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     710939.7   1777.3
Process Creation                                126.0      29246.3   2321.1
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4      12823.6   3024.4
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0       1837.1   3061.9
System Call Overhead                          15000.0    4751603.8   3167.7
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                        2984.5

Dan… secara keseluruhan performanya lebih baik sekitar 20%an dibandingkan OpenVZnya. Worth it lah.

Hasil tes GeekBench juga merefleksikan kesimpulan yang sama: lebih baik. Single core: 4577 dan Multicore: 7524. Linknya disini: https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/7579738

Mungkin OOT, tapi setelah saya amati soal OVZ dan KVM, saya lebih yakin bahwa OVZ lebih hemat resource (RAM+HDD) sedikit dibandingkan KVM untuk spesifikasi setara.

2 pemikiran pada “Benchmark VPS KVM Inception Hosting

    • Loh. Yang saya review diatas masih ada stoknya mas, lewat link diatas buka Hosting Servers > UK KVM NVMe SSD . Jangan lupa gunakan kupon diskon 50%nya Inception Hosting: BQY6DH1RA9, khusus pembayaran tahunan. Catatan, saya ga tahu sampai kapan kodenya aktif.

Tinggalkan komentar