Review EvoBurst Solutions: VPS harga miring spesifikasi wow!
Seringkali kita menemukan penyedia VPS yang memberikan RAM ukuran besar dengan harga murah tapi CPU corenya cuma 1 atau 2. Nah… kalau dari pengalaman sangat jarang sekali kita menggunakan memori server hingga 512MB kalau misal digunakan sebagai web server dan pengunjung situs anda masih terhitung ribuan per hari. Harddisk saja mungkin cuma terpakai 1-2 GB termasuk Linuxnya. Yang sering terjadi adalah prosesornya tidak mampu mengolah data secepat programnya sehingga sering terjadi 500 – Internal Server Error atau tidak responsif lagi.
Walaupun banyak core CPU juga tidak menjamin pasti stabil dan jelas dibagi dengan adil ke sesama pelanggan dalam satu node tapi tentu saja lebih baik dibandingkan dengan yang cuma 1 atau 2 core. Disini letak gilanya EvoBurst Solutions yang memberikan 24 core hingga 32 core tergantung lokasi VPS yang anda inginkan. Ya, kegilaan yang menguntungkan pelanggan tentunya. 😀
Catatan: Searang namanya sudah berubah menjadi Virtwire Global.
Kenapa saya bandingkan dengan VPS yang cuma 1 atau 2 core? Karena kurang lebih harga yang ditawarkan adalah setara. Saya membeli EvoBurst dengan RAM 1GB dan 24 vCPU core fair share seharga promo $18 atau kurang lebih Rp. 250.000 per tahun. Wow kan?
Sudah beberapa bulan saya menggunakannya untuk VestaCP dan tidak mengecewakan sama sekali, sangat jarang sekali terjadi masalah.
Walau sempat down beberapa kali tapi dalam hitungan menit sudah normal kembali, termasuk wajar untuk layanan VPS. Misal ada masalah maka akan diinformasikan lewat email sehingga kita tidak kaget misal ada maintenance atau server error.
Kurang lebih hasil benchmark VPSnya adalah sebagai berikut:
CPU model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5650 @ 2.67GHz
Number of cores : 24
CPU frequency : 2659.898 MHz
Total amount of ram : 1024 MB
Total amount of swap : 512 MB
System uptime : 14 days, 20:13,
Download speed from CacheFly: 83.6MB/s
Download speed from Coloat, Atlanta GA: 8.50MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Dallas, TX: 36.4MB/s
Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 13.9MB/s
Download speed from i3d.net, Rotterdam, NL: 311KB/s
Download speed from Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL: 419KB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Singapore: 83.0KB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Seattle, WA: 62.9MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, San Jose, CA: 92.7MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Washington, DC: 633KB/s
I/O speed : 132 MB/sSaya gunakan script dari FreeVPS karena sudah terlanjur aktif VPSnya, kalau memakai ServerBear memang lebih lengkap tapi membutuhkan VPS yang benar – benar baru. Ini supaya tidak terganggu pengujian performanya dan juga seluruh website saya yang dihosting disitu tidak ngelag saat diakses. Bisa memakan waktu beberapa jam soalnya. Harap maklum.
Update 19 Oktober 2015, akhirnya saya jalankan benchmark dari UnixBench:
# # # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # #
# # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # # #
# # # # # # ## ##### ##### # # # # ######
# # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # #
# # # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # #
#### # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # #
Version 5.1.3 Based on the Byte Magazine Unix Benchmark
Multi-CPU version Version 5 revisions by Ian Smith,
Sunnyvale, CA, USA
January 13, 2011 johantheghost at yahoo period com
1 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Execl Throughput 1 2 3
1 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 3
1 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 3
1 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 3
1 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Process Creation 1 2 3
1 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 3
1 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3
========================================================================
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)
System: esberg: GNU/Linux
OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.32-042stab108.8 -- #1 SMP Wed Jul 22 17:23:23 MSK 2015
Machine: i686 (unknown)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="ANSI_X3.4-1968", collate="ANSI_X3.4-1968")
CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5650 @ 2.67GHz (5319.8 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5650 @ 2.67GHz (5319.8 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 2: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5650 @ 2.67GHz (5319.8 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 3: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5650 @ 2.67GHz (5319.8 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 4: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5650 @ 2.67GHz (5319.8 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 5: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5650 @ 2.67GHz (5319.8 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 6: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5650 @ 2.67GHz (5319.8 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 7: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5650 @ 2.67GHz (5319.8 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 8: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5650 @ 2.67GHz (5319.8 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 9: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5650 @ 2.67GHz (5319.8 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 10: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5650 @ 2.67GHz (5319.8 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 11: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5650 @ 2.67GHz (5319.8 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 12: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5650 @ 2.67GHz (5319.8 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 13: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5650 @ 2.67GHz (5319.8 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 14: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5650 @ 2.67GHz (5319.8 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 15: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5650 @ 2.67GHz (5319.8 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 16: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5650 @ 2.67GHz (5319.8 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 17: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5650 @ 2.67GHz (5319.8 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 18: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5650 @ 2.67GHz (5319.8 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 19: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5650 @ 2.67GHz (5319.8 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 20: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5650 @ 2.67GHz (5319.8 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 21: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5650 @ 2.67GHz (5319.8 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 22: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5650 @ 2.67GHz (5319.8 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 23: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5650 @ 2.67GHz (5319.8 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
07:51:46 up 55 days, 9:50, 1 user, load average: 0.18, 0.17, 0.07; runlevel 2
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Mon Oct 19 2015 07:51:46 - 08:19:28
24 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 9386411.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 2209.1 MWIPS (8.1 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 2014.5 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 281433.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 95946.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 782583.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 569864.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 75782.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 5196.0 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 5064.3 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2508.7 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 446373.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 9386411.9 804.3
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2209.1 401.7
Execl Throughput 43.0 2014.5 468.5
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 281433.1 710.7
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 95946.1 579.7
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 782583.0 1349.3
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 569864.4 458.1
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 75782.6 189.5
Process Creation 126.0 5196.0 412.4
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 5064.3 1194.4
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2508.7 4181.2
System Call Overhead 15000.0 446373.7 297.6
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 637.1
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Mon Oct 19 2015 08:19:28 - 08:19:28
24 CPUs in system; running 24 parallel copies of testsTernyata lebih mampu dari yang saya perkirakan, sambil menjalankan benchmark system loadnya bisa mencapai 7.00 tapi membuka situs – situs yang dihosting lancar jaya. Walau secara skornya memang cukup kecil di 600an, mungkin sangat terbantu di 24 vCPUnya.
Terakhir adalah kualitas supportnya. Saat berkonsultasi lewat ticketnya mereka benar – benar sabar dan langsung ke pokok permasalahan. Walaupun bahasa Inggris saya belepotan dan kadang saya sendiri tidak tahu yang saya butuhkan apa. Hehe. 😀 Salut deh.
Jadi kesimpulannya saya puas terhadap layanan EvoBurst Solutions, harga layanannya sangat bagus apalagi kalau melihat apa yang didapatkannya, tapi kalau kadang – kadang down harap sabar ya. Tidak ditelantarkan kok.